🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.