🔗 Share this article Chemical Firms Controlled by Billionaire Jim Ratcliffe Obtained Up to £70m in British Government Support In the Last Four-Year Period Before this week's £50m state rescue package for its Grangemouth facility, chemical companies controlled by tycoon Jim Ratcliffe were already awarded as much as £70m in UK state aid over the past four years. Latest Disclosures and Financial Support According to official data published this week, public funding to Ratcliffe's chemical empire in the most recent year ranged from £16m and £38m. Since August 2022, the conglomerate has obtained between £28m and £70m. The government stepped in this week to provide Ineos with £50m to prop up its Scottish ethylene plant, concerned that otherwise the UK would lose its sole facility manufacturing ethylene—a vital raw material for plastics. The government also backed a £75m credit guarantee, while Ineos committed to invest £30m of its own funds. Plant Closure and Broader Context This intervention arrives after Ineos closed the adjacent oil refinery in late 2024, costing 400 jobs—a move described as a huge blow to the local community and a political problem for the government. Ratcliffe, who is worth $14.5bn, reportedly requested government help in October. This appeal comes at a time when the wide-ranging Ineos group, under the control of the 73-year-old, has been under considerable economic strain, partly due to sharply increased energy costs following Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Reflecting growing unease over its financial health, the credit rating agency downgraded Ineos's credit rating in September. Ratcliffe has also been required to invest significant funds into his off-road vehicle venture and efforts to revitalise the football club, in which he holds a minority stake. Form of Support and Official Responses The majority of the earlier government support came in the form of tax breaks in return for “voluntary agreements to reduce energy use and carbon dioxide emissions.” The value of these tax breaks for Ineos's plants in Grangemouth and Hull are reported as ranges rather than exact amounts. An Ineos spokesperson said the aid did not represent “favourable terms” for the company, but was “granted based on strict criteria, and open to any UK business that meets the requirements.” While Ratcliffe thanked the government for the £50m support in an official statement, Ineos also released more critical comments. In these, the industrialist launched a broadside against government policy, specifically carbon taxes levied on industrial users. “The solution is not decarbonisation by deindustrialisation,” Ratcliffe wrote. “Lacking a robust manufacturing base, the economy will falter. Soaring power prices and burdensome carbon levies are driving industry out of the UK at an unsustainable pace.” In further comments, Ratcliffe described carbon taxes as “an extremely foolish levy in the world,” arguing they put UK plants at a disadvantage against international competitors. Currently, most chemicals and plastics are not covered from the UK's initial carbon border adjustment mechanism. Investment and Environmental Pledges The Ineos representative further stated: “Ineos has invested over £400m at Grangemouth in the last five years to keep it as one of the most efficient chemical plants in Europe and to safeguard skilled jobs. The UK chemicals sector has had a very difficult year, yet everyone relies on this industry every day. Should we fail to manufacture these critical products in the UK, they are brought in from overseas, often from higher-carbon production abroad.” A senior Ineos executive, head of sustainability for the company's chemicals unit, said the new funding would be used to enhance energy efficiency, reduce carbon emissions, and upgrade plant performance. He explained the site, which uses an ethylene cracker utilising North Sea gas and US-sourced liquefied petroleum gas, had been under “intense strain” from rocketing energy costs and the UK's carbon taxes. Records show that Ineos has previously received substantial tax breaks from the EU, valued at hundreds of millions of euros—interestingly while Ratcliffe was a leading supporter of the campaign for the UK to leave the EU.